CYCLINGFORUM.COM - Where Cyclists Talk Tech --- Return To Home

 

    Register FAQ'sSearchProfileLog In / Log Out

 

****

cyclingforum.com ****

HOMECLUBS | SPONSORS | FEATURESPHOTO GALLERYTTF DONORS | SHOP FOR GEAR

Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
          View posts since last visit

Aero Drag / Disc Tests Article.
 Goto page Previous  1, 2

Author Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
Nick Payne
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 2626
Location: Canberra, Australia

3/24/15 1:44 AM


quote:
If it's safer for the riders, why not make the switch.
Safer in what respect? With a peloton full of disk brake rotors, how long before riders start getting sliced up by disks in mass pile-ups.

The push for disk brakes in road racing seems to me mostly a question of money. How can the manufacturers push new disk brake bikes to your average gullible rider unless said rider sees professional cyclists using them.

 Reply to topic    

ErikS
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 8337
Location: Slowing boiling over in the steamy south, Global Warming is real

3/24/15 3:59 AM

I know I sound like a crazy ole rider but I also don't see the advantage for normal riding. In crappy weather they can be nice I am sure but the limit has always been the tire and the road.

If they start going down mountains faster then I will believe in them. The weight issue won't matter because the UCI will stick with the minimum weight they have now and that is easy to get and has plenty of wiggle room for the added weight of the disk brakes.

The drag issue has to be addressed, thus far they are nothing but bricks on your bike.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Dave B
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4511
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

3/24/15 7:19 AM

Hot!


quote:
.....how long before riders start getting sliced up by disks in mass pile-ups.

Or burned from a hot disk in a downhill crash.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

3/24/15 9:55 AM

I wonder when the disc bikes are in full force in the Peloton if we will see more tubular or maybe tubeless being dominant.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

KerryIrons
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 3236
Location: Midland, MI

3/24/15 7:18 PM

Fork issues

Another thing to consider is that the fork needs to be beefed up to handle the forces of braking, and that will change the behavior of the fork. This will impact both comfort (probably negatively) and handling (possibly positively), not to mention added weight.

How that all sorts out will be a while in telling. I've always been able to lock up my wheels wet or dry, so I don't see the benefit of disc brakes but I do see the complications and cost.

 Reply to topic    

Dave B
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4511
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

3/25/15 6:27 AM

They Aren't?


quote:
I wonder when the disc bikes are in full force in the Peloton if we will see more tubular or maybe tubeless being dominant.

I thought tubulars are still the dominant tire in the pro peloton and clinchers/tubeless are the minority and used only when the tire sponsor insists.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

ErikS
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 8337
Location: Slowing boiling over in the steamy south, Global Warming is real

3/27/15 4:10 PM

Tubies are and always will the norm for pro racing. Any clincher use is forced by the sponsor. They train on clinchers though, most pros do a lot of solo training with no support vehicle with them, that concept is very rare and usually reserved for team camps and the big money contenders.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

3/27/15 4:24 PM

Tony Martin shocked tubular tire aficionados when he won last year's UCI time trial world championships on Continental clinchers, and then repeated the feat to capture the German national title.

2012 Article.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

dan emery
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 6890
Location: Maine

3/27/15 4:44 PM

I'm shocked!

Who would that shock? Bugno won world championship RRs on Michelin clinchers in '91 and '92. That's when I switched, figured they were probably good enough for me. I understand most pros do use sewups now. So what?

 Reply to topic    

ErikS
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 8337
Location: Slowing boiling over in the steamy south, Global Warming is real

3/28/15 4:19 PM

They use tubies because the entire package is lighter at the rim.

The ride is very close these days when you get high end clinchers.

I never intend to get tubies, they just don't fit a rec rider's needs at all. With light aero clincher rims out there, there is no need even if you want to do a fast gran fondo or the likes.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

3/28/15 4:38 PM

When I hit the lottery, I am going to have a support vehicle follow me and have wheels with sew-ups glued ready to go for flats. ;)

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

KerryIrons
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 3236
Location: Midland, MI

3/28/15 7:45 PM

Closeness


quote:
The ride is very close these days when you get high end clinchers.


You obviously have not been staying in touch with the Internet mantra. Now me, when I switched to clinchers after 30 years on tubulars, I could not really tell the difference. As a result of making this statement I have been informed that obviously I have no feel for the ride of a bike. I continue to suffer as a result. Eric Zabel said he couldn't tell the difference either, but what does he know?

 Reply to topic    

Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH

3/29/15 8:54 PM

Weight is not the only reason

Tubies are safer, as you can ride them when they flat and have a reasonable chance of being able to stop without crashing. A front flat on a clincher at race speed is pretty much a guarantee that you're going to get up close and personal with the pavement. A rear flat may be survivable, but that depends on the circumstances.

As for the feel, I'm pretty much with Kerry. I don't corner aggressively enough to appreciate any difference in feel. For my type of riding, 25mm clinchers are better suited than skinny tubulars. The other key feature of good clinchers is that they are perfectly round when mounted. Even good quality tubies tend to be somewhat lumpier. Clinchers simply ride smoother.

It used to be that you could get really light aluminum tubular rims (sub-300 grams). These days, it's hard to find anything under 400 grams and the clincher rims I'm riding are lighter than any Al tubulars I could find. Of course, you can get very light carbon tubular rims, but I'm not willing to pay a small fortune for rims or wheels with inferior braking capability. Someday when I switch to disc brakes for the road, carbon rims may be a reasonable option.

After 36 years of riding tubies exclusively, I've switched all my road bikes to clinchers and can't see myself ever going back.


Last edited by Brian Nystrom on 3/29/15 9:12 PM; edited 2 times in total

 Reply to topic    

sandiway
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4902
Location: back in Tucson

3/29/15 9:03 PM

Tubular glue can melt. Pros do roll tubulars and crash.

I don't believe tubulars are better. I borrowed someone's set of tubulars once and rode all winter on them. Yes, they were lighter. When I gave them back, I didn't miss them at all.

 Reply to topic    

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

3/29/15 9:33 PM

"Tubies are safer, as you can ride them when they flat"

They suck to ride flat and I am not sure the thump thump of the valve could not cause something else to break or happen. Conjecture perhaps.

But tubeless rims even with tubes and folding bead tires with open tubular design tires stay hooked. And symmetrical in terms of the tire between the rim and road equally hanging out each side the few times I have flatted at speed since building up wheel with said rims.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH

3/29/15 9:36 PM

Yes, we've all heard about spectacular crashes...

...on blistering hot pavement, but really, how many of them have you seen or heard of directly? The truth is that it's a very rare occurrence and we simply don't hear about or think about the thousands of flats that riders survive each season without crashing, because there's nothing of note about it.

Take a minute and think back to all of the riders you've seen in race coverage getting wheel changes when they haven't crashed. I'll bet we've all seen hundreds of them.

In contrast, I've never seen one case where a tubular rolled because the glue melted. Beloki's crash was caused by a slide on melting pavement that was caught, but violently pitched him.

This is a similar situation to helmet injury prevention statistics. The bulk of head impacts go unreported because there is no injury. It's the serious injuries and fatalities that we hear about.

 Reply to topic    

Nick Payne
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 2626
Location: Canberra, Australia

3/30/15 4:33 PM


quote:
I've never seen one case where a tubular rolled because the glue melted
Steve Hodge told me once that at the foot of a descent in a Spanish race he looked down at his front wheel and noticed that the colour was uneven as it rotated. He slowed to get a better look and realized that part of the tubular had rotated so that the sidewall rather than the tread was what was meeting the road. Needless to say he immediately stopped and got a replacement wheel. And I also remember that Neil Stephens was away in a break towards the end of a TDF stage and had his front tyre roll off in a roundabout - he hit the deck and watched the rest of the break continue towards the finish...

 Reply to topic    

Brian Nystrom
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 5101
Location: Nashua, NH

3/31/15 5:23 AM

OK, but what separated?

Did the glue bond between the rim and rim tape fail or the bond between the tire casing and the base tape fail? In the second case, was this after a descent or was it just due to a bad glue job? Without more details, how can any real judgement be made?

Tubulars do introduce variables that aren't present with clinchers, but on balance, I still say that properly glued tubulars are safer.

 Reply to topic    

KerryIrons
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 3236
Location: Midland, MI

3/31/15 7:31 PM

Melting

The riders protested a recent stage in the Tour of Oman because it was 45 C and a bunch of tires were blowing. The word used was "exploded." This can't be due to pressure from the heat because mechanics know how to deal with that. The only thing that comes to my mind is that the glue melted, the tire rotated on the rim, and the valve stem was torn out. I had this happen to me in the South Dakota Badlands on a very hot day.

 Reply to topic    

sandiway
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4902
Location: back in Tucson

4/1/15 8:30 AM

I think it'll be an even bigger problem with high-end carbon tubular rims. The heat can't be conducted away efficiently. Aluminum is a great heat sink.

Sandiway

 Reply to topic    

ErikS
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 8337
Location: Slowing boiling over in the steamy south, Global Warming is real

4/1/15 5:50 PM

I have never seen a clincher just go boom. Though I did have one come off the back rim 20 years ago because of my shitty work putting it on. Got in hurry and pinched the tube.

I have seen rolled tubies. More than once.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

PLee
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 3713
Location: Brooklyn, NY

4/2/15 6:24 AM

I've done it - blown up a clincher. Something you only do once . . .

 Reply to topic    


Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
           View New Threads Since My Last Visit VIEW THREADS SINCE MY LAST VISIT
           Start a New Thread

 Display posts from previous:   


Goto page Previous  1, 2  
Last Thread | Next Thread  >  

  
  

 


If you enjoy this site, please consider pledging your support

cyclingforum.com - where cyclists talk tech
Cycling TTF Rides Throughout The World

Cyclingforum is powered by SYNCRONICITY.NET in Denver, Colorado -

Powered by phpBB: Copyright 2006 phpBB Group | Custom phpCF Template by Syncronicity