CYCLINGFORUM.COM - Where Cyclists Talk Tech --- Return To Home

 

    Register FAQ'sSearchProfileLog In / Log Out

 

****

cyclingforum.com ****

HOMECLUBS | SPONSORS | FEATURESPHOTO GALLERYTTF DONORS | SHOP FOR GEAR

Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
          View posts since last visit

panniers vs saddle bag vs other storage options
 Goto page 1, 2  Next

Author Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
zeke
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 516
Location: denver

5/7/14 7:11 AM

panniers vs saddle bag vs other storage options

I'm foolishly contemplating a bike camping trip with kids. I don't have a touring bike and would be using my road bike that doesn't have eyelets for panniers. I'll be towing the 2 kids in a Chariot trailer, and I can pack some gear onto the trailer. But not everything will fit on the Chariot, so I need another option.

Does anyone have experience with any of the seatpost mounted luggage racks? Looks like this one can accomodate panniers:

https://www.performancebike.com/bikes/Product_10052_10551_1023820_-1_400031__400031

I'll pull gear out this weekend to see how much could fit on the trailer and how much I'd actually need to get onto the luggage rack.

Any recommendations for a seatpost mounted rack? Bad idea?

 Reply to topic    

Andy M-S
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3377
Location: Hamden (greater New Haven) CT

5/7/14 8:37 AM

Hmm.

A seatpost rack will not carry too terribly much (and if you have a lightweight post (i.e., carbon), might not even be a good idea).

There are a number of inexpensive (and expensive) racks that will mount using the rear brake mount and the rear skewer. The Axiom Streamliner Road comes to mind.

With a rack like that, you could mount panniers. One of the nice features of the Axiom is that it sets the rack back far enough to avoid heel strikes (even for me, and I wear size 13 shoes).

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

5/7/14 10:26 AM

No MTN bike in your stash?

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Matthew Currie
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 802
Location: Vermont

5/7/14 12:25 PM

I have a seatpost rack on my mountain bike and it will indeed take a good deal of weight. I sometimes have used a single sided pannier with some heavy stuff in it, and it's fine. Mine does not have the side guards to keep a pannier positioned, so the pannier I use has a piece of paneling to stiffen it. On mine you can also pull the plastic plug out of the main beam and stow a pump inside, but I don't know whether the one shown will allow that.

The one I have also uses a quick release clamp, and it must be very tight. I would guess that the clamp tightens better with less stress, but that's a guess.

However, my mountain bike is very hefty, including the seatpost. I'd want to make sure the road bike can handle it before going far. At first glance this looks like a pretty well designed rack.

 Reply to topic    

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

5/7/14 1:22 PM

I have an old handlebar pack. Also good for hand resting positions. Used it on the Paramount when I first got it. It does get wonky with a steep front end when loaded to heavy I noticed. But on a MTB or other, like CX with 72^ or slower front end be better maybe. Has a clear map top too which is nice.

I could set it up behind the seat post with a tandem stem maybe. May look into that. Maybe I should have included the long range question.thread in your thread, but I did not want to hijack on ya. But perhaps similar questions as it pertains to hauling stuff.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Nick Payne
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 2626
Location: Canberra, Australia

5/7/14 3:38 PM

I like saddlebags. They don't affect the handling much if at all when properly mounted, and the large ones like a Carradice Camper Longflap can carry enough for light touring - ie not camping.


 Reply to topic    

April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC

5/7/14 4:56 PM

Not for camping

I think it would be a lot more fun and less stressful to go from motel to motel instead.

Camping with TWO kids, you're talking about a pretty big tent that sleeps 3, two or three sleeping bags and mattresses! That's not even include change of clothes and such. Never mind stove and cookware. I don't see how all of that would fit, never mind the total weight!

Wouldn't the kids get really bored sitting in the trailer?

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

KerryIrons
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 3236
Location: Midland, MI

5/7/14 7:11 PM

P clamps


quote:
would be using my road bike that doesn't have eyelets for panniers


P clamps would be a way to mount racks on a frame with no eyelets. Not as secure an anchor as brazed on mounts but it sounds like you're not adding a lot of weight to them. An alternative to consider is lashing up an attachment to your trailer that could support a bag or two.

 Reply to topic    

dan emery
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 6890
Location: Maine

5/8/14 2:43 AM

Love the Longflap

I have a Longflap on my commuter/errand bike (along with a Carradice Shopper Pannier). Both work great.

 Reply to topic    

Andy M-S
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3377
Location: Hamden (greater New Haven) CT

5/8/14 3:55 AM

I must be doing something wrong

I absolutely love the aesthetic of the saddlebag, and I've owned a number over the years. But they just don't work for me. They rub against my thighs, they stick out too far (years ago I caught one on a fence I was narrowly passing, and it ripped out a strap).

Dunno.

As I said, I love the way they look, but I just haven't been able to make one work for me.

Consequently, I have been using a handlebar bag more and more, sometimes supplemented with panniers. Ironweed makes a nice LARGE handlebar bag (the "Orpington") for not terribly much money, and I've had good luck with that.

http://www.ironweedbp.com/orpington-front-bag.html

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

dan emery
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 6890
Location: Maine

5/8/14 6:20 AM

Handlebar bags are good too

I've got a Berthoud handlebar bag on my rando bike, and the bike handles great even with the bag stuffed. It was designed for a handlebar bag though. More than one way to skin a cat. It's all good!

 Reply to topic    

zeke
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 516
Location: denver

5/8/14 6:36 AM

Thanks for the input!

The Axiom Streamliner (mounts to rear break and skewer) looks like it could be a good option - thanks Andy!

As for April's question, the wisdom of doing this trip with kids is up for question. Will they be bored in the trailer? Maybe. But it will be a group of friends with similar aged kids - so the time out of the bike trailer will be fun for them. And we wouldn't be trying to cover very much distance. We'd be riding on a rail trail and only doing ~20 miles/day between campsites.

 Reply to topic    

Dave B
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4511
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

5/8/14 7:51 AM

The Axiom Streamliner looks like a good choice for mounting on a road bike without seatstay or dropout eyelets but be sure it won't interfere with the hitch attachment for your trailer. That may be a disqualifier.

I have some experience with seatpost mounted racks and they were adequate for light loads. As Andy M-S noted, I would never mount one on a carbon seatpost or a very light, thin wall aluminum one either.

Spend a few extra dollars and get a thick wall, cheap post like a Kalloy and dedicate it to the rack. You have to get the rack's mounting clamp very tight to keep it from swinging to either side.


Last edited by Dave B on 5/8/14 9:39 AM; edited 1 time in total

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Pat Clancy
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 1353
Location: Manchester, CT

5/8/14 8:35 AM

Not keen on the seat post rack

I have toured twice on my Bianchi road bike - it has no eyelets. The first time I used a seat post rack for a 5 day credit card tour. I was carrying maybe 25 lbs in the panniers and found that it affected the handling in a negative way. Made the bike feel very top heavy with all the weight attached to a single point of contact just under the saddle. How that would combine with pulling a trailer is anyone's guess.

The second time I used a conventional rack mounted on p-clamps. That also had an issue - the Bianchi has tapered seat stays and I could not get the p-clamps to stay in the desired location an inch or two above the axle. They would slip down until the chain side clamp interfered with my ability to shift to the smallest cog. Not a fatal problem when touring as I seldom needed that gear. Maybe your stays and/or dropout design is such that it would not be a problem.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

April
Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 6593
Location: Westchester/NYC

5/8/14 9:40 AM


quote:
As for April's question, the wisdom of doing this trip with kids is up for question. Will they be bored in the trailer? Maybe. But it will be a group of friends with similar aged kids - so the time out of the bike trailer will be fun for them. And we wouldn't be trying to cover very much distance. We'd be riding on a rail trail and only doing ~20 miles/day between campsites.

If you have other "Dads" doing the same as a group, it might make a bit more sense.

I still question the wisdom of doing that nonetheless. I think if the kids were old enough to share the pedalling (via a trail-a-bike or similar setup), it would make a lot more sense. Otherwise, they're just sitting inside "some vihecle". Why not just drive to the campground and ride unencumbered? You get the same capming part of the experience for the kids. And can still take them along on the trailer if they like being in there.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Sparky
Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 19083
Location: PDX

5/8/14 9:44 AM

Otherwise, they're just sitting inside "some vhecle".


Yelling out "are we there yet', what is different? ;)

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Andy M-S
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3377
Location: Hamden (greater New Haven) CT

5/8/14 12:02 PM

Dad... DAD!!!

"...Dad? The right pannier fell off five miles back..."

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

KerryIrons
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 3236
Location: Midland, MI

5/8/14 7:04 PM

just sitting inside "some vihecle".

We did thousands of miles with our kids in a trailer. Sure we had to stop more often but we had a lot of great family trips, first with just one in the trailer, then that one graduated to a kid-back tandem and the second one in the trailer. It's a lot more entertaining for them to watch the world go by as you talk to them about what they are seeing than being strapped into a car seat and staring at the seatback in the station wagon.

 Reply to topic    

Andy M-S
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3377
Location: Hamden (greater New Haven) CT

5/8/14 7:30 PM

Concur

Though we didn't do any extended touring, most of my kids did some time in a trailer and they enjoyed it. Child No. 3 graduated to a trail-a-bike. I used to take him to preschool on it, then pick him up. He'd come running out from the playground, grab his helmet, and climb aboard. At 19, he bikes and shows no interest in earning a driver's license.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

Nick Payne
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 2626
Location: Canberra, Australia

5/8/14 11:48 PM


quote:
I absolutely love the aesthetic of the saddlebag, and I've owned a number over the years. But they just don't work for me. They rub against my thighs, they stick out too far (years ago I caught one on a fence I was narrowly passing, and it ripped out a strap).

For the hitting the thighs problem, have a look at the Nitto saddlebag mount in the photos I posted above. It moves the saddlebag back by a couple of inches from where it would be if mounted on the saddle loops. It does really need a rack underneath for stabilising the bag, though - the rack in the photos is also a Nitto - it has a loop protruding upwards at the front that is in an ideal position for holding the stabilising tab that Carradice put on their bags.

And here's my homemade take on seatpost rack plus bag. I've had this one in use for over 20 years, and haven't seen a commercial one that I think works as well. Wouldn't work for a short rider, though, as the saddlebag is positioned considerably lower than when attached at saddle height:

 Reply to topic    

Andy M-S
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3377
Location: Hamden (greater New Haven) CT

5/9/14 3:15 AM

yeah...

I've tried adaptors, both commercial and homemade. But once you go to installing a rack, the minimalist aesthetic is gone, and I might as well load up panniers.

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail

dan emery
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 6890
Location: Maine

5/9/14 8:53 AM

Bagman works for me

I use Bagman with the Longflap, otherwise the bag tilts too much for my taste. Once the Bagman is on I don't even notice it.

"Minimalist Aesthetic" - Get over it, dude! :)

 Reply to topic    

SteveS
Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 954
Location: Indiana

5/12/14 12:32 PM


quote:

But it will be a group of friends with similar aged kids - so the time out of the bike trailer will be fun for them. And we wouldn't be trying to cover very much distance. We'd be riding on a rail trail and only doing ~20 miles/day between campsites.



You need a Sherpa if you are going to haul enough stuff for the kids to enjoy themselves camping and want to do it again. Heck, its a challenge for most adults to haul enough comfort items with them to enjoy multiple days living out of a pair of panniers. The problem is twofold, weight as well as volume.

Take a vehicle for the group. Each morning one parent drives the vehicle full of camping gear for the group to the next campsite and then rides back (unladen) where everyone else should be finishing up breakfast. Hook up the trailer and the only weight you are hauling is a trailer full of kids.

Whatever you decide I would recommend a weekend overnighter to test out the gear, the kids and yourself.

 Reply to topic    

dan emery
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 6890
Location: Maine

5/12/14 2:32 PM

Minimlist Aesthetic revisited

Ummm, Dude, I saw those hammered fenders...

 Reply to topic    

Andy M-S
Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3377
Location: Hamden (greater New Haven) CT

5/12/14 2:52 PM

Yeah, well

The fenders:

$35/set, I swear. They replaced a set of SKS that were starting to have problems.

I no longer consider a bicycle without fenders to be adequate!

 Reply to topic     Send e-mail


Return to CyclingForum Home Page CYCLING TECH TALK FORUM
           View New Threads Since My Last Visit VIEW THREADS SINCE MY LAST VISIT
           Start a New Thread

 Display posts from previous:   


Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Last Thread | Next Thread  >  

  
  

 


If you enjoy this site, please consider pledging your support

cyclingforum.com - where cyclists talk tech
Cycling TTF Rides Throughout The World

Cyclingforum is powered by SYNCRONICITY.NET in Denver, Colorado -

Powered by phpBB: Copyright 2006 phpBB Group | Custom phpCF Template by Syncronicity